Get Permission Inani: Hysteroscopy as a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic tool in infertility management

Introduction

Infertility is characterized as childlessness after 1year of unprotected intercourse. This is otherwise called sub ripeness. It influences 10-15% of couples in the regenerative age group.1 Infertility addresses a day to day existence emergency to the couple encountering it. It might seriously influence the couple's mental concordance, sexual life and has numerous social ramifications. Consequently every gynecologist wonders whether or not to affirm barrenness until the individual in question has completely depleted all demonstrative and helpful modalities.

The consciousness of fruitlessness is expanded these days and multicentric way to deal with the treatment have been presented, yet the administration of barrenness is dependably challenging.2

Normal fertility depends on various male and female factors. Hysteroscopy is utilized for perception of Uterine cavity and cervical canal. Hysteroscopy can be consolidated in one meeting to allow a full study of the Uterine cavity and cervical canal and is valuable in distinguishing the reason for barrenness in female3

This likewise limits the emergency clinic stay of the barren individual for examinations.4

Materials and Methods

Study was conducted at Index Medical College Hospital and Research Centre in Dec 2013 to July 2015. All those patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria mentioned below were included in the study and those who had one or more criteria mentioned while exclusion criteria were deleted from the study. Thus 200 patients were selected for the study.The scheduled investigations were done to determine fitness for surgery. Patient was admitted one day prior to the procedure, and pre anaesthetic checkup was done. Hysteroscopy was scheduled in preovulatory period between day 5 and day 8 of cycle and done under general anesthesia.

Inclusion criteria

  1. All the women aged between 20 to 40 years, attending outpatient with primary and secondary infertility.

  2. To evaluate the cause in women with primary & secondary infertility with normal semen analysis of husband.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Severe cardiac or respiratory disease

  2. Generalised peritonitis

  3. Diaphragmatic hernia

  4. Umbilical hernia

Result

Table 1

Duration of infertility

Duration of infertility in years

Primary infertility

Secondary infertility

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

20-25

86

57.3

17

34

103

51.5

26-30

49

32.6

29

58

78

39

31-35

07

4.6

02

04

09

4.5

36-40

08

5.5

02

04

10

05

Total

150

100

50

100

200

100

[i] The distribution of patients according to duration of infertility.

Table 2

Findings on hysteroscopy

Duration of infertility in years

Primary infertility

Secondary infertility

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Normal

19

12.6

07

14

26

13

Abnormal

73

48.6

21

42

94

47

Hyperemia (congestion)

18

12

05

10

23

11.5

Polyp

13

8.6

03

06

16

08

Septum

08

5.3

05

10

13

6.5

Atrophy/scarred

07

4.6

04

08

11

5.5

Adhesions

05

3.3

03

06

08

04

Fibroid

07

4.6

02

04

09

4.5

Total

150

100

50

100

200

100

Table 3

Operative interventions on hysteroscopy

Duration of infertility in years

Primary infertility

Secondary infertility

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Septal resection

04

2.6

10

20

14

07

Polypectomy

55

36.6

11

22

66

33

Adhesiolysis

72

48

20

40

92

46

Myomectomy

19

12.6

09

18

28

14

Total

150

100

50

100

200

100

Discussion

Diagnostic hysteroscopy provides a reliable information in evaluation of uterine cavity and detection of intrauterine diseases.5, 6, 7, 8 Mean prevalence of uterine malformation in general population is 4.3%, in infertility is 3.5% and in recurrent pregnancy loss 13%.

The incidence of uterine anomaly is 7.6%. Subseptate and septate uterus is the most common uterine malformation in our study, which is undiagnosed by prior USG.

Septate uterus is the most common uterine anomaly associated with increased reproductive failure rates.9 The reproductive performance of uncorrected septum is poor like 80% pregnancyloss, 10%preterm delivery, 10% term delivery. Pregnancy outcome improved after surgical correction in to 80% term, 5% preterm delivery,15% pregnancy loss. Complication rate of diagnostic hysteroscopy is low as 0.012%. In view of low complication, less time consuming hysteroscopy could be done in all infertility patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy.10, 11, 12

Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy having low complications(0.012%) and is less time consuming.13, 141516

Conclusion

Hysteroscopy may appear to be invasive, but is more beneficial, as diagnosis and therapeutic interventions can be done at the same sitting.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

TA Shokeir HM Shalan MM El-Shafei Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrheic infertile womenJ Obstet Gynaecol Res20043028493

2 

J Hucke De Bruyne F Balan Hysteroscopy in infertility - diagnosis and treatment including falloposcopyContri Gynecol Obstet2000201320

3 

R Baur W Creling K Dietrich Small diameter laparoscopy using a microlaparoscopeHum Reprod1996134298305

4 

P Kaminski M Gajewska M Wielgos I Szymusik K Ziolkowska R Bartkowiak The usefulness of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of infertilityNeuro Endocrinol Lett200627681320

5 

K Jayakrishnan K Aby R Koshy Role of laparohysteroscopy in women with normal pelvic imaging and failed ovulation stimulation with intrauterine inseminationJ Hum Reprod Sci201031204

6 

GS Subrata Lall S Debdatta M Suhash GB Ajit Ranjan Comparative evaluation of sonosalpingography hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy for determination of tubal patencyObstet Gynecol India200757215861

7 

T Naz L Hassan S Sultan F Nighat Laparoscopic evaluation in infertilityJ Coll Physician Surg Pak2009191170411

8 

R Woolcott A Petchpud Wool cott et al the efficacy of hysteroscopy comparison of woman presenting with infertility vs other gynecological symptoms Aust NjAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol19953533103

9 

S Chanu GR Pal S Panda AS Singh Diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy for evaluation of infertility: Our experience in a tertiary care hospitalJ Hum Reprod Sci20181111923

10 

E Zhang Y Zhang L Fang Q Li J Gu Combined Hysterolaparoscopy for the Diagnosis of Female Infertility: a Retrospective Study of 132 Patients in ChinaMater Sociomed201426315663

11 

AV Mehta AP Modi BM Raval SP Munshi SB Patel SM Dedharotiya Role of diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in the evaluation of infertilityInt J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol2016543777

12 

R Selim A Gergawy K Shaheen MH Balaha The role of combined diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in unexplained infertilityInt Surg J202291395405

13 

JH Miller RK Weinberg NL Canino NA Klein MR Soules The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive ageAm J Obstet Gynecol199918149529

14 

BW Mol JA Collins EA Burrows FV Der Veen PM Bossuyt Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcomeHum Reprod1999145123779

15 

MS Parveen Role of combined diagnostic laparoscopy and simultaneous diagnostic hysteroscopy for evaluation of female subfertility actorsJ Surg Pak2010151447

16 

Z Godinjak E Idrizbegovic Should diagnostic hysteroscopy be a routine procedure during diagnostic laparoscopy in infertile women?Reprod Biomed Online20088447



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 15-12-2023

Accepted : 06-02-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.sajhp.2024.004


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 359

PDF Downloaded: 120